Hidden assets in financial remedy — disclosure tools when you suspect concealment
REVIEWED BY: Sean McNamara on 2026-08-30
If your spouse is hiding money — undeclared accounts, undervalued businesses, "loans" to relatives, cash-in-hand income — the financial remedy system has real tools to find it. Courts are experienced with concealment and increasingly penalise it. This guide sets out the disclosure arsenal and how to use it. It is general information, not legal advice.
The duty of full and frank disclosure
- Both parties sign their Form E with a statement of truth: full disclosure of assets, income and liabilities
- Deliberate non-disclosure is contempt of court — and it poisons the discloser's credibility for the rest of the case
- The duty is continuing: if you discover an asset after disclosure, the duty applies until the case concludes
The disclosure tools, in escalation order
1. Questions to questions (Part 25 questionnaire)
- After Form E exchange, each party files a questionnaire — targeted questions about gaps, inconsistencies and omissions in the other's Form E
- Answers are served; vague answers generate follow-ups
- The FDR court checks questionnaires were properly answered before allowing the FDR
2. Specific disclosure orders
- Where answers are inadequate, the court can order the party to produce named documents: bank statements for named accounts, company accounts, property transactions, cryptowallet records
- Banks, employers and platforms can be ordered to produce records directly
3. Court orders to third parties
- Norwich Pharmacal / Bankers Trust–style orders (in family cases adapted) can compel third parties — banks, accountants, companies registries — to disclose records about the respondent's assets
- HMRC information can be sought through the court in appropriate cases
4. Single joint expert (SJE)
- A forensic accountant jointly instructed by both parties can examine business accounts, trace funds, and value companies realistically
- Essential where a business is the main asset — its "book value" rarely reflects reality
5. Search orders and asset freezing
- In serious cases: freezing injunctions (section 37 Matrimonial Causes Act / freezing orders) prevent assets being moved out of reach during proceedings
- Search orders permit entry to premises to preserve evidence — exceptional
- Form D50G can stop transactions intended to defeat financial claims
6. Draw adverse inferences
- Where a spouse fails to disclose or gives evasive evidence, the court can infer that the hidden assets exist and are of a size favourable to the injured party — the leading authorities (including the Court of Appeal in NG v SG and the Supreme Court's approach in financial cases) allow the judge to "add back" or assume concealed wealth rather than let concealment win
- The burden effectively shifts: the non-discloser must dispel the inference
Red flags worth investigating
- Lifestyle inconsistent with declared income
- Recent "gifts" or "loans" to family members
- New companies or partnerships registered during the marriage's last years
- Undisclosed directorships (search Companies House — free)
- Properties held in relatives' names
- Frequent cash withdrawals
- Cryptocurrency (ask directly; treat denials carefully — tracing is possible)
What you can do without a court order
- Companies House: free searches of directorships, shareholdings, filed accounts
- Land Registry: £7 title documents show who owns property and what's charged on it
- Social media and public records: lifestyle evidence
- Keep records of everything — your own observations are evidence when organised
If the final order was made on false disclosure
- The court can set aside a financial order obtained by fraud or material non-disclosure (the law here has evolved; the Supreme Court in Sharland and Gohil confirmed fraud unravels the deal) — apply promptly with the fresh evidence
Official links
- Form E — financial statement (gov.uk)
- Companies House — free search
- HM Land Registry — search for property title
- Financial remedy forms (gov.uk)
- Practice Direction 9A — financial remedy procedure
YourFamilyCase.co.uk is an independent information directory — we are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to HMCTS or gov.uk. This page is general information and is not legal advice. Non-disclosure cases are technical — a forensic accountant and a financial remedy solicitor are usually the difference between suspicion and proof.
Content verified against the official HMCTS court directory, gov.uk forms and fees pages, and the professional body registers (SRA, FMC, Bar Council). Last reviewed September 2026.